A few months ago, Gap stores introduced the “Red” line of clothing, letting the clothing company look somewhat altruistic by giving some of the proceeds to fight AIDS in Africa.

When I first saw the ads, I wanted to do my part to help fight AIDS in Africa by wearing a shirt that says “Inspi(red)” but really means “While the rest of you fashion philistines shop at J Crew or Banana Republic, I’m doing my part to help fight AIDS in Africa. Well, mostly it’s helping the Gap’s bottom line and quarterly earnings, but a portion of the proceeds, at least, goes to help fight AIDS in Africa.”

Yeah, like Steven Spielberg shops at the Gap
Steven Spielberg pretends he’s just like us by wearing a jacket that none of us would ever wear.

I visited the Gap, ready to stem off any white, AIDS-free guilt by buying an overpriced Gap T-shirt. Imagine my surprise, though, to learn that the Gap’s normal outrageous prices had been made even higher, as the “Red” shirts had been bumped from the regular $25 mark to $35.

I had two problems. First, I’m not going to pay $35 for a T-shirt. I no longer buy concert T-shirts for that very reason. It’s just silly.

Second, and perhaps more importantly, all the Gap did was raise the price by $10, meaning they didn’t seem to lose any finances in this endeavor. They could pocket the $25 normally charged for a T-shirt and send the remaining $10 over to fight AIDS in Africa, and all the while, they’re not out anything. In fact, they probably stand to make more money once customers continued purchasing khakis, jeans and other Gap-related items to go with their “Red” clothes.

Be that as it may, I still wanted to do something, so I set out to find the cheapest, yet most fashionably acceptable article in the store. I located a $10 bracelet featuring a red bead that supposedly has some ties to Africa, but if it’s not a blood diamond, frankly, I don’t care. I made the purchase and left the store feeling decent about myself.

A couple of weeks ago, I returned to the Gap, only to find that the “Red” line was now on clearance, and the T-shirt I wanted had been marked down to $10. I faced a moral dilemma. Do I make a stand and refuse to buy the shirt, saying it would have been better of me to have done so when the money, even if a fraction, was going to charity rather than as a last-ditch effort to turn some sort of profit? Or do I make the purchase and make it clear that I care less about AIDS in African than I do cash in my wallet?

I bought the shirt.

I am a bad person.

But at least I look nice.


2 thoughts on “Huckste(red)

  1. Dude, it would have been a crime not to buy the shirt.

    Seriously, in Utah, a dude tried to buy the shirt, decided not too, now he’s dead because while walking out of the store, cops filled his body with twenty rounds. He died of a heart attack eight days later.

    See? The “(red)” campaign actually does save lives.

  2. I also took advantage of the “sale” for Africa’s future. I can’t say whether or not any of my money actually went to African relief efforts, but at least my boxer shorts have a conscience.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s